Fire guarnatee Under Indian guarnatee Law

Law And Order - Fire guarnatee Under Indian guarnatee Law

Good afternoon. Yesterday, I discovered Law And Order - Fire guarnatee Under Indian guarnatee Law. Which could be very helpful if you ask me so you. Fire guarnatee Under Indian guarnatee Law

A ageement of insurance comes into being when a person seeking insurance safety enters into a ageement with the insurer to indemnify him against loss of asset by or incidental to fire and or lightening, explosion, etc. This is primarily a ageement and hence as is governed by the general law of contract. However, it has certain special features as insurance transactions, such as utmost faith, insurable interest, indemnity, subrogation and contribution, etc. These system are base in all insurance contracts and are governed by special system of law.

What I said. It shouldn't be in conclusion that the real about Law And Order . You see this article for info on that wish to know is Law And Order .

Law And Order

Fire Insurance:

According to S. 2(6A), "fire insurance business" means the firm of effecting, otherwise than incidentally to some other class of insurance business, contracts of insurance against loss by or incidental to fire or other occurrence, customarily included among the risks insured against in fire insurance business.

According to Halsbury, it is a ageement of insurance by which the insurer agrees for consideration to indemnify the assured up to a certain extent and subject to certain terms and conditions against loss or damage by fire, which may happen to the asset of the assured during a exact period.
Thus, fire insurance is a ageement whereby the person, seeking insurance protection, enters into a ageement with the insurer to indemnify him against loss of asset by or incidental to fire or lightning, explosion etc. This policy is designed to insure one's asset and other items from loss occurring due to faultless or partial damage by fire.

In its spoton sense, a fire insurance ageement is one:

1. Whose principle object is insurance against loss or damage occasioned by fire.

2. The extent of insurer's liability being microscopic by the sum assured and not necessarily by the extent of loss or damage sustained by the insured: and

3. The insurer having no interest in the safety or destruction of the insured asset apart from the liability undertaken under the contract.

Law Governing Fire Insurance

There is no statutory enactment governing fire insurance, as in the case of maritime insurance which is regulated by the Indian maritime insurance Act, 1963. The Indian insurance Act, 1938 generally dealt with regulation of insurance firm as such and not with any general or special system of the law relating fire of other insurance contracts. So also the general insurance firm (Nationalization) Act, 1872. In the absence of any legislative enactment on the subject , the courts in India have in dealing with the topic of fire insurance have relied so far on judicial decisions of Courts and opinions of English Jurists.

In determining the value of asset damaged or destroyed by fire for the purpose of indemnity under a policy of fire insurance, it was the value of the asset to the insured, which was to be measured. Prima facie that value was measured by reference of the shop value of the asset before and after the loss. Any way such formula of appraisal was not applicable in cases where the shop value did not recount the real value of the asset to the insured, as where the asset was used by the insured as a home or, for carrying business. In such cases, the part of indemnity was the cost of reinstatement. In the case of Lucas v. New Zealand insurance Co. Ltd.[1] where the insured asset was purchased and held as an income-producing investment, and therefore the court held that the proper part of indemnity for damage to the asset by fire was the cost of reinstatement.

Insurable Interest

A person who is so concerned in a asset as to have benefit from its existence and prejudice by its destruction is said to have insurable interest in that property. Such a person can insure the asset against fire.

The interest in the asset must exist both at the inception as well as at the time of loss. If it does not exist at the commencement of the ageement it cannot be the subject-matter of the insurance and if it does not exist at the time of the loss, he suffers no loss and needs no indemnity. Thus, where he sells the insured asset and it is damaged by fire thereafter, he suffers no loss.

Risks Covered Under Fire insurance Policy

The date of windup of a ageement of insurance is issuance of the policy is different from the acceptance or assumption of risk. Section 64-Vb only lays down broadly that the insurer cannot assume risk prior to the date of receipt of premium. Rule 58 of the insurance Rules, 1939 speaks about develop payment of premiums in view of sub section (!) of Section 64 Vb which enables the insurer to assume the risk from the date onwards. If the proposer did not desire a particular date, it was potential for the proposer to negotiate with insurer about that term. Precisely, therefore the Apex Court has said that final acceptance is that of the assured or the insurer depends naturally on the way in which negotiations for insurance have progressed. Though the following are risks which seem to have covered Fire insurance policy but are not totally covered under the Policy. Some of contentious areas are as follows:

Fire: Destruction or damage to the asset insured by its own fermentation, natural heating or spontaneous combustion or its undergoing any heating or drying process cannot be treated as damage due to fire. For e.g., paints or chemicals in a facility undergoing heat rehabilitation and consequently damaged by fire is not covered. Further, burning of asset insured by order of any communal Authority is excluded from the scope of cover.

Lightning : Lightning may succeed in fire damage or other types of damage, such as a roof broken by a falling chimney struck by lightning or cracks in a building due to a lightning strike. Both fire and other types of damages caused by lightning are covered by the policy.

Aircraft Damage: The loss or damage to asset (by fire or otherwise) directly caused by aircraft and other aerial devices and/ or articles dropped there from is covered. However, destruction or damage resulting from pressure waves caused by aircraft traveling at supersonic speed is excluded from the scope of the policy.

Riots, Strikes, Malicious And Terrorism Damages: The act of any person taking part along with others in any disturbance of communal peace (other than war, invasion, mutiny, civil commotion etc.) is construed to be a riot, assault or a terrorist activity. Unlawful action would not be covered under the policy.

Storm, Cyclone, Typhoon, Tempest, Hurricane, Tornado, Flood and Inundation: Storm, Cyclone, Typhoon, Tempest, Tornado and Hurricane are all discrete types of violent natural disturbances that are accompanied by thunder or strong winds or heavy rainfall. Flood or Inundation occurs when the water rises to an abnormal level. Flood or inundation should not only be understood in the base sense of the terms, i.e., flood in river or lakes, but also accumulation of water due to choked drains would be deemed to be flood.

Impact Damage: Impact by any Rail/ Road car or animal by direct perceive with the insured asset is covered. However, such vehicles or animals should not belong to or owned by the insured or any occupier of the premises or their employees while acting in the policy of their employment.

Subsidence And Landslide Inculuding Rockside: Destruction or damage caused by Subsidence of part of the site on which the asset stands or Landslide/ Rockslide is covered. While Subsidence means sinking of land or building to a lower level, Landslide means sliding down of land regularly on a hill.

However, general cracking, settlement or bedding down of new structures; settlement or movement of made up ground; coastal or river erosion; defective make or workmanship or use of defective materials; and demolition, construction, structural alterations or mend of any asset or ground-works or excavations, are not covered.

Bursting And/Or Overflowing Of Water Tanks, Apparatus And Pipes: Loss or damage to asset by water or otherwise on catalogue of bursting or accidental overflowing of water tanks, apparatus and pipes is covered.

Missile Testing Operations: Destruction or damage, due to impact or otherwise from trajectory/ projectiles in association with missile testing operations by the Insured or anyone else, is covered.

Leakage From automatic Sprinkler Installations: Damage, caused by water accidentally discharged or leaked out from automatic sprinkler installations in the insured's premises, is covered. However, such destruction or damage caused by repairs or alterations to the buildings or premises; repairs removal or postponement of the sprinkler installation; and defects in building known to the insured, are not covered.

Bush Fire: This covers damage caused by burning, either accidental or otherwise, of bush and jungles and the clearing of lands by fire, but excludes destruction or damage, caused by Forest Fire.

Risks Not Covered By Fire insurance Policy

Claims not maintainable/ covered under this policy are as follows:

o Theft during or after the occurrence of any insured risks

o War or nuclear perils

o Electrical breakdowns

o Ordered burning by a communal authority

o Subterranean fire

o Loss or damage to bullion, costly stones, curios (value more than Rs.10000), plans, drawings, money, securities, cheque books, computer records except if they are beyond doubt included.

o Loss or damage to asset moved to a different location (except machinery and equipment for cleaning, repairs or renovation for more than 60 days).

Characterictics Of Fire insurance Contract

A fire insurance ageement has the following characteristics namely:

(a) Fire insurance is a personal contract

A fire insurance ageement does not ensure the safety of the insured property. Its purpose is to see that the insured does not suffer loss by conjecture of his interest in the insured property. Hence, if his association with the insured asset ceases by being transferred to other person, the ageement of insurance also comes to an end. It is not so connected with the subject matter of the insurance as to pass automatically to the new owner to whom the subject is transferred. The ageement of fire insurance is thus a mere a personal ageement between the insured and the insurer for the payment of money. It can be validly assigned to other only with the consent of the insurer.

(b) It is entire and indivisible contract.

Where the insurance is of a binding and its contents of stock and machinery, the ageement is expressly agreed to be divisible. Thus , where the insured is guilty of breach of duty towards the insurer in respect of one subject matters covered by the policy , the insurer can avoid the ageement as a whole and not only in respect of that particular subject mater , unless the right is restricted by the terms of the policy.

(c) Cause of fire is immaterial

In insuring against fire, the insured wishes to protect him from any loss or detriment which he may suffer upon the occurrence of a fire, Any way it may be caused. So long as the loss is due to fire within the meaning of the policy, it is immaterial what the cause of fire is, generally. Thus , either it was because the fire was lighted improperly or was lighted properly but negligently attended to thereafter or either the fire was caused on catalogue of the negligence of the insured or his servants or strangers is immaterial and the insurer is liable to indemnify the insured. In the absence of fraud, the proximate cause of the loss only is to be looked to.

The cause of the fire Any way becomes material to be investigated

(1). Where the fire is occasioned not by the negligence of, but by the willful

(2) Where the fire is due is to cause falling with the exception in the contract.

Limitation Of Time

Indemnity insurance was an trade by the insurer to grant on the insured a contractual right, which prima facie, came into existence immediately when the loss was suffered by the happening of an event insured against, to be put by the insurer into the same position in which the accused would have had the event not occurred but in no better position. There was a former liability, i.e. To indemnify, and a secondary liability i.e. To put the insured in his pre-loss position, either by paying him a specifying whole or it might be in some other manner. But the fact that the insurer had an selection as to the way in which he would put the insured into pre-loss position did not mean that he was not liable to indemnify him in one way or another, immediately the loss occurred. The former liability arises on the happening of the event insured against. So, the time ran from the date of the loss and not from the date on which the policy was avoided and any suit filed after that time limit would be barred by limitation.[2]

Who May Insure Against Fire?

Only those who have insurable interest in a asset can take fire insurance thereon. The following are among the class of persons who have been held to possess insurable interest in, asset and can insure such property:

1. Owners of property, either sole, or joint owner, or partner in the firm owning the property. It is not indispensable that they should proprietary also. Thus a lesser and a lessee can both insure it jointly or severely.

2. The vender and purchaser have both proprietary to insure. The vendor's interest continues until the conveyance is completed and even thereafter, if he has an unpaid vendor's lien over it.

3. The mortgagor and mortgagee have both certain interests in the mortgaged asset and can insure, per Lord Esher M.R."The mortgagee does not claim his interest through the mortgagor , but by virtue of the mortgage which has given him an interest certain from that of the mortgagor"[3]

4. Trustees are legal owners and beneficiaries the useful owners of trust asset and each can insure it.

5. Bailees such as carriers, pawnbrokers or storehouse men are responsible for there safety of the asset entrusted to them and so can insure it.

Person Not Entitled To Insure

One who has no insurable interest in a asset cannot insure it. For example:

1. An unsecured creditor cannot insure his debtor's property, because his right is only against the debtor personally. He can, however, insure the debtor's life.

2. A shareholder in a firm cannot insure the asset of the firm as he has no insurable interest in any asset of the firm even if he is the sole shareholder. As was the case of Macaura v. Northen insurance Co.[4] Macaura. Because neither as a uncomplicated creditor nor as a shareholder had he any insurable interest in it.

Concept Of Utmost Faith

As all contracts of insurance are contracts of utmost good faith, the proposer for fire insurance is also under a certain duty to make a full disclosure of all material facts and not to make any misrepresentations or misdescreptions thereof during the negotiations for obtaining the policy. This duty of utmost good faith applies equally to the insurer and the insured. There must be faultless good faith on the part of the assured. This duty to search for utmost good faith is ensured b requiring the proposer to avow that the statements in the proposal form are true, that they shall be the basis of the ageement and that any incorrect or false statement therein shall avoid the policy. The insurer can then rely on them to correlate the risk and to fix proper selected and accept the risk or decline it.

The questions in the proposal form for a fire policy are so framed as to get all information which is material to the insurer to know in order to correlate the risk and fix the premium, that is, all material facts. Thus the proposer is required too give information relating to:

o The proposer's name and address and occupation

o The description of the subject matter to be insured adequate for the purpose of identifying it including,

o A description of the locality where it is situated

o How the asset is being used, either for any manufacturing purpose or perilous trade.etc

o either it has already been insured

o And also ant personal insurance history including the claims if any made buy the proposer, etc.

Apart from questions in the proposal form, the proposer should disclose either questioned or not-

1. Any information which would indicate the risk of fire to be above normal;

2. Any fact which would indicate that the insurer's liability may be more than general can be incredible such as existence of indispensable manuscripts or documents, etc, and

3. Any information bearing upon the more; hazard involved.

The proposer is not obliged to disclose-

1. information which the insurer may be presumed to know in the commonplace policy of his firm as an insurer;

2. Facts which tend to show that the risk is lesser than otherwise;

3. Facts as to which information is waived by the insurer; and

4. Facts which need not disclosed in view of a policy condition.

Thus, assured is under a solemn promulgation to make full disclosure of material facts which may be relevant for the insurer to take into catalogue while deciding either the proposal should be proper or not. While making a disclosure of the relevant facts, the

Doctrine Of Proximate Cause

Where more perils than one act simultaneously or successively, it will be difficult to correlate the relative succeed of each peril or pick out one of these as the actual cause of the loss. In such cases, the religious doctrine of proximate cause helps to resolve the actual cause of the loss.
Proximate cause was defined in Pawsey v. Scottish Union and National Ins. Co.,[5]as "the active, effective cause that sets in appeal a train of events which brings about a succeed without the intervention of any force started and working actively from a new and independent source." It is dominant and effective cause even though it is not the nearest in time. It is therefore indispensable when a loss occurs to investigate and ascertain what is the proximate cause of the loss in order to resolve either the insurer is liable for the loss.

Proximate Cause Of Damage

A fire policy covers risks where damage is caused by way of fire. The fire may be caused by lightening, by explosion or implosion. It may be succeed of riot, assault or on catalogue of any, malicious act. Any way these factors must finally lead to a fire and the fire must be the proximate cause of damage. Therefore, a loss caused by theft of asset by militants would not be covered by the fire policy. The view that the loss was covered under the malicious act clause and therefore .the insurer was liable to meet the claim is untenable, because unless and until fire is the proximate cause f damage, no claim under a fire policy would be maintainable.[6]

Procedure For Taking A Fire insurance Policy

The steps complex for taking a fire insurance policy are mentioned below:

1. selection of the insurance Company:

There are many companies that offer fire insurance against unforeseen events. The individual or the firm must take care in the selection of an insurance company. The judgment should rest on factors like goodwill, and long term standing in the market. The insurance companies can either be approached directly or through agents, some of them who are appointed by the firm itself.

2. Submission of the Proposal Form:

The individual or the firm owner must submit a completed prescribed proposal form with the indispensable details to the insurance firm for proper consideration and subsequent approval. The information in the Proposal Form should be given in good faith and must be accompanied by documents that verify the actual worth of the asset or goods that are to be insured. Most of the companies have their own personalized Proposal Forms wherein the exact information has to be provided.

3. search for of the Property/ Consideration:

Once the duly filled Proposal Form is submitted to the insurance company, it makes an "on the spot" search for of the asset or the goods that are the subject matter of the insurance. This is regularly done by the investigators, or the surveyors, who are appointed by the firm and they need to description back to them after a proper investigate and survey. This is imperative to correlate the risk complex and conjecture the rate of premium.

4. Acceptance of the Proposal:

Once the detailed and extensive description is submitted to the insurance firm by the surveyors and connected officers, the previous makes a proper perusal of the Proposal Form and the report. If the firm is satisfied that their is no lacuna or foul play or fraud involved, it formally "accepts" the Proposal Form and directs the insured to pay the first selected to the company. It is to be noted that the insurance policy commences after the payment and the acceptance of the selected by the insured and the company, respectively. The insurance firm issues a Cover Note after the acceptance of the first premium.

Procedure On Receipt Of consideration Of Loss

On receipt of the consideration of loss, the insurer requires the insured to yield details pertaining to the loss in a claim from relating to the following information-

1. Circumstances and cause of the fire;

2. Occupancy and situation of the premises in which the fire occurred;

3. Insured's interest in the insured property; that is capacity in which the insured claims and either any others are concerned in the property;

4. Other insurances on the property;

5. Value of each item of the asset at the time of loss together with proofs thereof , and value of the saving ,if any; and

6. whole claimed

Furnishing such information relating to the claim is also a health precedent to the liability of the insurer. The above information will enable the insurer to verify whether-

(1) The policy is in force;

(2) The peril causing the loss is an insured peril;

(3) The asset damaged or lost is the insured property.

Rules for calculation of value of property

The value of the insured asset is-

1) Its value at the time of loss, and

2) At the place of loss, and

3) Its real or intrinsic value without any regard for its sentimental vale. Loss of prospective profit or other consequential loss is not to be taken into account.

Filing Of Claims

How a claim arises?

After a ageement of fire insurance has come into existence, a claim may arise by the doing of one or more insured perils on an unsecured property. There may in increasing one or more uninsured perils also operating simultaneously or in succession of the property. In order that the claim should be valid the following conditions must be fulfilled:

1. The occurrence should take place due to the doing of an insured peril or where both insured and other perils operated , the dominant or effective cause of the loss must have been an insured peril;

2. The doing of the peril must not come within the scope of the policy exceptions;

3. The event must have caused loss or damage of the insured property;

4. The occurrence must be during the currency of the policy;

5. The insured must have fulfilled all the policy conditions and should also comply with requirements to be fulfilled after the claim had arisen.

Material Facts In Fire Insurance: previous Conviction Of The Accused

The criminal description of an assured could sway the moral hazard, which insurers had to assess, and the non-disclosure of a serious criminal offence like robbery by the plaintiff would a material non-disclosure.

Insured'S Duty On Outbreak Of Fire, Implied Duty

On the outbreak of a fire the insured is under an implied duty to search for good faith towards the insurers and the in chase of it the insured must do his best to avert or minimize the loss. For this purpose he must (1) take all inexpensive measures to put out the fire or forestall its spread, and (2) aid the fire brigade and others in their attempts to do so at any rate not come in their way.
With this object the insured asset may be removed to a place of safety. Any loss or damage the insured asset may retain in the policy of attempts to combat the fire or during its removal to a place of safety etc., will be deemed to be loss proximately caused by the fire.

If the insured fails in his duty willfully and thereby increases the burden of the insurer, the insured will be deprived of his right to revive any indemnity under the policy.[7]

Insurer'S proprietary On The Outbreak Of Fire

(A) Implied Rights

Corresponding to the insured's duties the insurers have proprietary by the law, in view of the liability they have undertaken to indemnify the insured. Thus the insurers have a right to-

o Take inexpensive measures to extinguish the fire and to minimize the loss to property, and

o For that purpose, to enter upon and take proprietary of the property.

The insurers will be liable to make good all the damage the asset may retain during the steps taken to put out the fire and as long as it in their possession, because all that is carefully the natural and direct consequence of the fire; it has therefore been held in the case of Ahmedbhoy Habibhoy v. Bombay Fire maritime Ins. Co [8] that the extent of the damage flowing from the insured peril must be assessed when the insurer gives back and not as at the time when the peril ceased.

(B) Loss caused by steps taken to avert the risk

Damage sustained due to action taken to avoid an insured risk was not a consequence of that risk and was not recoverable unless the insured risk had begun to operate. In the case of Liverpool and London and Globe insurance Co. Ltd v. Canadian general galvanic Co. Ltd., [9] the Canadian supreme Court held that "the loss was caused by the fire fighters' mistaken reliance that their action was indispensable to avert an explosion , and the loss was not recoverable under the insurance policy, which covered only damage caused by fire explosion., and the loss was not recoverable under the insurance policy, which covered only damage caused by fire or explosion."

(C) Express rights

Condition 5- in order to protect their proprietary well insurers have prescribed for better proprietary expressly in this health according to which on the happening of any destruction or damage the insurer and every person authorized by the insurer may enter, take or keep proprietary of the building or premises where the damage has happened or wish it to be delivered to them and deal with it for all inexpensive purposes like examining, arranging, removing or sell or arrange off the same for the catalogue of whom it may concern.

When and how a claim is made?

In the event of a fire loss covered under the fire insurance policy, the Insured shall immediately give consideration thereof to the insurance company. Within 15 days of the occurrence of such loss, the Insured should submit a claim in writing, giving the details of damages and their estimated values. Details of other insurances on the same asset should also be declared.

The Insured should secure and produce, at his own expense, any document like plans, catalogue books, investigation reports etc. On quiz, by the insurance company.

How insurance May Cease?

Insurance under a fire policy may cease in any of the following circumstances, namely:

(1) Insurer avoiding the policy by conjecture of the insured making misrepresentation, misdescription or non-disclosure of any material particular;

(2) If there is a fall or displacement of any insured building range or buildings or part thereof , then on the expiry of seven days wherefrom, except where the fall or displacement was due to the action of any insured peril; notwithstanding this, the insurance may be revived on revised terms if express consideration is given to the firm as soon as the occurrence takes place;

(3) The insurance may be complete at any tie at the request of the insured and at the selection of the firm on 15 days consideration to the insured

Conclusion

Tangible asset is exposed to numerous risks like fire, floods, explosions, earthquake, riot and war, etc. And insurance safety can be had against most of these risks severally or in combination. The form in which the cover is expressed is numerous and varied. Fire insurance in its spoton sense is involved with giving safety against fire and fire only. So while granting a fire insurance policy all the requisites need be fulfilled. The insured are under a moral and legal promulgation to be at utmost good faith and should be telling true facts and not just fake grounds only with the greed to recover money. Additional all insurance policies help in the improvement of a Developing nation. Hence insurance companies have a burden to help the insured when the insured are in trouble.

Reference:

1. (1983) Vr 698 (Supreme Court of Vienna)

2. Callaghan v. Dominion insurance Co. Ltd. (1997) 2 Lloyd's Rep. 541 (Qbd)

3. Small v. U.K maritime insurance association (1897) 2 Qb 311
4. (1925) Ac 619

5. (1907) Case.

6. National insurance firm v. Ashok Kumar Barariio

7. Devlin v. Queen insurance Co, (1882) 46 Ucr 611.

8. (1912) 40 Ia 10 Pc

9. (1981) 123 Dlr (3d) 513 (Supreme Court of Canada)

Books Referred:

1. The Economics of Fire safety by Ganapathy Ramachandran

2. Modern insurance Law, by John Birds

3. The Handbook of insurance Regulatory and improvement Authority Act and Regulations with Allied Laws ,by Nagar

I hope you obtain new knowledge about Law And Order . Where you can put to used in your daily life. And most of all, your reaction is passed about Law And Order .