Domestic Violence No taste Orders in Washington State

Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History - Domestic Violence No taste Orders in Washington State

Good morning. Yesterday, I discovered Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History - Domestic Violence No taste Orders in Washington State. Which may be very helpful to me therefore you. Domestic Violence No taste Orders in Washington State

In Washington State, there is no crime of Domestic Violence. Rather, Domestic Violence is a tag that is put on other crimes indicating that there is a family or household connection in the middle of the parties involved. Most jurisdictions will enforce a No experience Order that prohibits the defendant in a Domestic Violence ("Dv") case from having experience with the alleged victim of the crime. The order will often prohibit experience with the victim's children, home and place of work too.

What I said. It just isn't the actual final outcome that the actual about Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History. You check this out article for information on an individual want to know is Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History.

Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History

Family or household relationship

According to Rcw 10.99.020(3), family or household members is defined as:

[S]pouses, former spouses, persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time, adult persons connected by blood or marriage, adult persons who are presently residing together or who have resided together in the past, persons sixteen years of age or older who are presently residing together or who have resided together in the past and who have or have had a dating relationship, persons sixteen years of age or older with whom a person sixteen years of age or older has or has had a dating relationship, and persons who have a biological or legal parent-child relationship, along with stepparents and stepchildren and grandparents and grandchildren.

As you can see, this definition is extremely broad. It is far more inclusive then what most people would expect it to be. The same is true for the types of crimes that are labeled "Domestic Violence." Most people only think of charge when it comes to domestic violence, however there are many other crimes that can carry the Dv tag.

Mandatory Arrest

According to Rcw 10.31.100(2)(c), an officer must make an arrest if: The person is sixteen years or older and within the preceding four hours has assaulted a family or household member as defined in Rcw 10.99.020 and the officer believes:

(i) A felonious charge has occurred;

(ii) an charge has occurred which has resulted in physical injury to the victim, whether the injury is observable by the responding officer or not; or

(iii) that any physical activity has occurred which was intended to cause another person reasonably to fear imminent serious physical injury or death. physical injury means physical pain, illness, or an impairment of physical condition. When the officer has probable cause to believe that family or household members have assaulted each other, the officer is not required to arrest both persons. The officer shall arrest the person whom the officer believes to be the traditional physical aggressor. In manufacture this determination, the officer shall make every uncostly endeavor to consider:

(i) The intent to safe victims of domestic violence under Rcw 10.99.010;

(ii) the comparative extent of injuries inflicted or serious threats creating fear of physical injury; and

(iii) the history of domestic violence in the middle of the persons involved.

If you get arrested for a crime appealing domestic violence, a No experience Order will slam into place roughly immediately.

No experience Orders

There are two types of No experience Orders in Washington State: Pre-Trial and Post Conviction. Both types of orders preclude the defendant from having experience with the alleged victim. However, neither type prevents the victim from trying to have experience with the defendant, since only the defendant goes to jail if the order is violated. In other words, the No experience Orders limit only the defendant's behavior.

Pre-Trial

Pre-Trial Orders are issued against the defendant (sometimes called a Respondent) before he or she is convicted of having done anything wrong. These orders can preclude experience in the middle of the Respondent and the alleged victim of the crime, the victim's children (even if they are the Respondent's children too), the victim's place of work and the victim's home (even if it's the Respondent's home too).

In other words, these orders can force you away from your home and your kids before you have even been convicted of a crime. This is true even if the victim says that nothing happened or that anything did happen was blown all out of proportion.

Pre-trial orders stay in place until there is a resolution to the criminal case or until a Judge lifts it.

Post-Conviction

A No experience Order issued after conviction can carry the same types of restrictions that a Pre-Trial order does. Post-Conviction Orders are generally good for a year, however a Judge can increase that if he or she feels that the facts warrant it.

Civil Standby

Since a No experience Order can preclude you from going to your own home, the Courts will generally allow you one trip home to get clothes and a few personal items. However, you must be accompanied by a Law promulgation Officer. This process is called a "Civil Standby." You must experience the law promulgation agency and program a time for the Civil Standby. Be aware, however, that this is a low priority activity for most law promulgation agencies, so the civil standby will only be done when they have the time to spare.

Violating a No experience Order

A willful violation of a No experience Order is a gross misdemeanor; which means that you can get up to a year in jail and a ,000 fine. Since violating a Domestic Violence No experience Order is itself labeled a crime of domestic violence, your ownership to own or possess firearms will be forfeited upon conviction - even if no gun was used, possessed, mentioned or in any other way used or contemplated. This is true even where the basic criminal case, which caused the No experience Order to be issued, is dismissed.

Being in a group place, even the courthouse, is not a defense to violating the order. This means that if an order is issued against you and you see the protected person at a grocery store then you must leave. Inadvertent experience may technically not violate the order, but you may well have to go in front of a Judge to defend yourself. also the stress involved, you may have to spend more money in order to hire an attorney.

Even if the victim invites the contact, the respondent can face jail time if the order is violated. What I see most often in my cases, is the following scenario:

Two people have a relationship. Something happens and the police are called. Because of everyone's sensitivity to "Domestic Violence" the police err on the side of charging someone. A No experience Order then slams into place, precluding the two people from having experience with one another. It may also make one of them unexpectedly homeless - but that is a distinct issue. People, being people, want to work the qoute out and the alleged victim contacts the defendant and says something to the ensue of "I'm so sorry that all of this is happening. Come home and I'll make it worth your while." The problem, of course, is that the defendant takes the alleged victim up on the offer. Generally, legal problems multiply for the defendant shortly thereafter as the happy consolidate go out to celebrate their rekindled connection only to pull a "slow and go" at a stop sign - or some other minor traffic infraction. They then get stopped by the police. When the officer runs the occupants' information, up jumps the No experience Order and the defendant is arrested then taken to jail where he is now facing an added charge.

Removing the Order

It is very difficult to remove a Pre-Trial No experience order once it is in place. Even if the victim comes in and testifies before the Judge that the order is not needed, most Judges will leave the order in place.

One strategy is to have the defendant evaluated by a Domestic Violence rehabilitation Agency. If a counselor is willing to tell the Judge that the defendant would not pose a danger to the victim if the order is removed, then the Judge can eliminate the order. The rehabilitation agency may want to get the defendant into classes before according to make a hint to the Judge.

Another strategy is to ask the Court to modify the No C0ontact Order to allow marriage counseling. Some Judges will need that experience only be allowed while monitored by a third party from the rehabilitation agency.

Once a No experience Order has been modified to allow conditional contact, a Judge is more likely to remove the order later, unless there is a new problem.

Victim Rights

Most Prosecutors' Offices have a Domestic Violence Advocate. It is this person's job to help the victim of a domestic violence offense understand what services are ready to them and help keep them informed as the court process moves along.

I have seen numerous cases where the victim does not want the No experience Order to be in effect. Going through the victims advocate person can sometimes be helpful.

Most courts have a form that the alleged victim can fill out requesting that the Judge drop the No experience Order. In my experience, most Judges will voice the order even after the victim asks to have it dropped. Even though the order remains in place, having the victim ask for it to be removed is still valuable, since it may be useful on a later endeavor to remove the order.

Gun Rights

Conviction for a crime labeled Domestic Violence will cause you to loose your right to own or possess firearms. This is a lifelong ban.

Example

In one case I had, the husband was arrested for a Domestic Violence charge when, during an argument, he threw a bowl into their kitchen sink, chipping it. The argument was overheard by a colse to neighbor who called the police. The police arrived and when they looked in the sink, they found the chipped bowl and arrested the husband for domestic violence malicious mischief. There was no allegation that the husband threw the bowl at, or even near, his wife. Since Washington is a community property state, both the husband and the wife had an ownership interest in the bowl, thus by chipping his bowl, the husband damaged property belonging to another (i.e. His wife) and was therefore liable under Malicious Mischief. Without counsel, the husband (who had no prior criminal history) pled guilty at arraignment. He was given a one year No experience Order which prevented him from going home for a year or having any experience with his wife.

Had the husband contacted an attorney prior to pleading guilty, he may not have had a conviction at all. Even if there was a conviction, an attorney could have helped him avoid such a long No experience Order.

Copyright (c) 2007 The Cahoon Law Office - All ownership reserved.

I hope you get new knowledge about Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History. Where you can put to easy use in your daily life. And most importantly, your reaction is passed about Law And Order Criminal Intent Cast History.